Talk:Andrew Garfield/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (talk · contribs) 02:21, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Reviewing.  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  02:21, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Looking good so far; references 3 & 4 have a blockquote within them. They should either be article content, or notes, but not in the references themselves :) I'll finish the rest of the review Tues.  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  12:21, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Done &mdash; Robin   (talk)  19:43, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
 * You had such a well-done article already, and I white gloved everything....its a GA! yay! --  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  12:35, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you! &mdash; Robin   (talk)  17:43, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks also! All Hallow&#39;s Wraith (talk) 01:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Andrew Garfield passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: