Talk:Andrew Jaspan

POV
I'ved marked this as POV. Apart from the introduction para, it seems to be focussing on negative aspects of Jaspan. I doubt he has no positive aspects. —Felix the Cassowary 07:45, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

Those negative aspects are not untrue though. Just because not as many pro Jaspan things have been written as anti Jaspan, does that make it POV even if they are all true? Xtra 07:53, 2 September 2005 (UTC)


 * No, but as it currently stands it looks like an attempt to insult Jaspan. I don’t know anything about him other than that he edits The Age, and that some people don’t like him and have insulted him. I come here to find out more about him, and I've found out that he edits The Age, and some editors have done what appears to be a less-subtle form of insulting him. Anyway, normally people aren't downright cruel; they have a background and this can change the light of what they've said and done. This needs to be covered. —Felix the Cassowary 10:16, 2 September 2005 (UTC)


 * I made some changes to address PoV issues. I'd like to take the PoV warning down, unless there are objections.FRS 15:57, 26 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Looks excellent to me. I'll remove the POV tag now, but I won't mind at all if anyone reverts it. Ambi 01:49, 27 October 2005 (UTC)