Talk:Andrew Johnson's drunk vice-presidential inaugural address

Title
Did Andrew Johnson also deliver a sober vice-presidential inaugural address? If not, including "drunken" in the title of this article seems unnecessary (although it did grab my attention). Plantdrew (talk) 04:23, 29 December 2023 (UTC)


 * @Plantdrew He did not have any other VP addresses that I know of, LOL. But this *is* the only known drunken inaugural address in US history and/or this speech is only notable *because* he was (allegedly) blasted out of his mind. I'm not going to cry if "drunken" goes away but I also think it's the most important adjective that describes this event. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ jengod (talk) 04:38, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I'd argue that the drunkenness is what makes it notable more than anything else, so I'd keep it in the title personally.★Trekker (talk) 15:17, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

"Pre-ceremony"
It's all I can do not to change this hed to (what would seem the more accurate and appropriate) "Pre-game". Daniel Case (talk) 21:35, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @Daniel Case It may or may not have had that subhed in an earlier draft but it was determined to be "old vandalism" and changed. :) jengod (talk) 21:39, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Do “aftermath” and “consequences” need to be two different sections?
Im confused as the difference between the two sections and whether they should be combined or renamed (consequences changed to something more like “legacy” or “impact”?

Sydpresscott (talk) 03:49, 10 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Definitely doesnt need those specific subheads. And anything in those two sections could probably be rearranged in several possible ways, and/or trimmed. Please dive in if you see fit! jengod (talk) 04:18, 10 March 2024 (UTC)