Talk:Angela P. Harris

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

University of California

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Feminism

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

note[edit]

Noting significance of scholarship: Right now, Westlaw shows 1000+ cites for Harris' 1990 Stanford Law Review article; it was an incredibly influential paper, one of several such very notable papers she's written. However, it's hard to distill that into a ref cite. Thoughts? --lquilter 00:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

defunct refs[edit]

Defunct refs (e.g., from prior institutional profiles):

UC Berkeley Faculty Profile^{[failed verification]}

Selected bibliography[edit]

Harris is listed as the lead author in most of the items in §Selected bibliography. When I follow the ISBN links to WorldCat, or Google books, or Amazon, she is not listed there as lead author. Shouldn't the authors in these citations be the listed in the same way as they are listed in the cited work?

—Trappist the monk (talk) 10:13, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia must have style on this, but I'm not a style manual geek. My personally preferred method of citation is to follow the published style or conventions of the field (first), alphabetical (second), and to bold or highlight the relevant author. But let's do whatever wikipedia style says. WP:MOS. --Lquilter (talk) 14:58, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see a lot of citations. For the great preponderance of them (I would venture to say almost all), when there are multiple authors (journal articles especially), authors are listed in the order that they appear in the published work. There is generally a lead author whose name appears first followed by everyone else in descending order of contribution.

As for MOS:, I tried several searches without success. Either MOS doesn't address this topic, or I didn't use the correct search terms. Please give a try, perhaps you will find the right search terms.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 15:30, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The MOS included "Citing sources". Relevantly there is no house style at Wikipedia, so I would say that conventions of the field should apply. So feel free to arrange authors in the published order that you've found. (NB: In legal scholarship, I wouldn't presume that order indicates substantiality of contribution. In many jointly-authored works, for instance, order is alphabetical; in others, such as long-standing casebooks, order might be based on time of joining the project.) --Lquilter (talk) 17:26, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since I wasn't the editor who added the bibliography, I'm probably not the right one for the job. Rather I think that the task of fixing the citations is in Editor The Vintage Feminist's bailiwick.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 12:01, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If the article is about Jane Doe then I place Doe, Jane first. If there are three or four authors, I check to see if any of the others have entries on Wikipedia, if they do then I put their name second with an author-link. Otherwise they are generally in the order that the book cover had them.

As far as I know it is just the personal choice of the editor, but if WP ever decides on a convention I'll be happy to go with the community's decision. --The Vintage Feminist (talk) 15:51, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Angela P. Harris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:39, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]