Talk:Angela Shelton

Untitled
Having come to this article after seeing a PROD on Searching for Angela Shelton, I concluded that, while the documentary is perhaps sufficiently notable to merit its own article, it is likely appropriate that the documentary history be provided here, inasmuch as Shelton was a singular force in the production of the documentary and inasmuch as the history of the documentary dovetails neatly and inextricably with the history of Shelton's professional career. I thus re-merged the documentary information (concomitantly cleaning it up) and redirected Searching for Angela Shelton here. If others feel that the documentary ought to be discussed separately, they should certainly be bold and return the body of the information to the article apropos of the documentary, leaving, of course, a Main article link directly infra to the sectional heading. Joe 17:35, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Myspace link and WP:EL
I have added the myspace link back to the page because I feel that it is important to the article, too important to not be included. I have been able to verify that the Myspace link DOES belong to Angela Shelton. It is mentioned on her weblog page,, which also mentions the wiki page I have created. kc12286 03:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)kc12286

Fair use rationale for Image:AngelaShelton.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:AngelaShelton.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 23:46, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Relies extensively on biased promotional source
This article is written like an advertisement and consistently does not cite sources for its poetic, inappropriate claims. This really should be flagged, no? 108.183.33.114 (talk) 17:01, 5 February 2022 (UTC)