Talk:Animal Outlook

POV
This article presents no criticisms of this organization and uses a completely inappropriate tone, particularly the paragraph about the egg labeling legal fight. Natalie 22:46, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Sounds like Soap Boxing to me
 * I agree. Definitely changed a lot since I started it... Archer7 18:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * In that case, I think you picked the wrong tag, since the tag clearly states "This is primarily a statement about the article's subject, not necessarily its quality or veracity" (emphasis mine). Natalie 00:11, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * An admittedly non-exhaustive search has not netted me a lot of non-COK sources, and so far all of those hits but one (a blog, and thus not reliable) have been positive. A big problem here is the fact that COK owns at least a half-dozen domain names. Natalie 00:18, 23 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Kickass. I'm still not having any luck finding independent sources. If you have access to Lexis Nexus or similar, that might help. Natalie 18:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Okay. So, in the interest of impartiality, I have removed or altered all of the content that contains adjective bias. Also, I have removed those links that are unmistakably promotional. What does everyone think of the change?Ares0524 15:34, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks a lot better stubbed. It's too bad there aren't many online sources to use... Oh well. Natalie 19:09, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Weird that no one could find the Washington Post articles about the group, which came out in 2003 and 2005 (before all these 2007 comments). Also, to take out the egg labeling campaign completely (without just trying to make it neutral if it was not already so) is also a form of non-neutrality in that it amounts to removing facts which are quite relevant to this encyclopedia article. The egg labeling is probably one of their most noteworthy events. I've added information about their recent campaigns.--Gloriamarie (talk) 20:55, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

The legal advocacy section added after this conversation happened (i.e. in 2016) uses an inappropriate tone in the first paragraph. The section also contains a statement that does not appear to be backed up by the source stating "[illegally obtained profits] could impact the price of milk for years" while the source states "will likely continue to affect the price of milk for years to come". Wallby (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Compassion Over Killing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cok.net/feat/article-wp.php
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160402091527/http://eatocracy.cnn.com/2014/06/25/undercover-animal-abuse-videos/ to http://eatocracy.cnn.com/2014/06/25/undercover-animal-abuse-videos/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:52, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Compassion Over Killing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6DIAXlvM8?url=http://www.cok.net/feat/article-wp.php to http://www.cok.net/feat/article-wp.php
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140515085217/http://usvegweek.com/ to http://www.usvegweek.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:15, 11 August 2017 (UTC)