Talk:Animality studies

Requested move
as non-controversial move. (The user could have moved it if autoconfirmed.) --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 03:20, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

User:Mlundblad/animalitystudies → AnimalityStudies — - [I'm a new user, so unsure of how to do all this, but I think this page is ready to go up officially?] --Mlundblad (talk) 04:26, 25 October 2009 (UTC)Mlundblad

Oppose: First, the name is not a real word. According to naming conventions the article should be called Animality studies (note the separation of words and sentence case capitalization). Second, there is no evidence that "animality studies" is generally recognized as a field separate from animal studies; indeed, it appears to represent a non-neutral point of view, and perhaps even a fringe viewpoint. Third, the subject is already treated in more depth in the Animal studies article, and is therefore an impermissible content fork. Fourth, this proposed article has almost no encyclopedic content. Fifth, this proposed article stands by itself: in has no internal links to other relevant Wikipedia articles. For these reasons, if this page were moved to article space in its current state, it would be an immediate candidate for deletion. —Finell (Talk) 11:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Animality studies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091005014056/http://animalitystudies.colostate.edu:80/ to http://animalitystudies.colostate.edu

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:36, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Sources found
I have removed the PROD, but if I attempted to expand and update this myself, I'd mess it up, so I'm instead putting here what I found.

Books
Possibly also this on "critical animal studies" (an alternative term?):
 * Divinanimality: Animal Theory, Creaturely Theology, Fordham UP, 2014
 * Amy Ratelle, Animality and Children's Literature and Film, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015
 * Animalities: Literary and Cultural Studies Beyond the Human, ed. Lundblad, Edinburgh UP, 2017, ISBN 9781474400022 (also Google Books
 * Disability and Animality: Crip Perspectives in Critical Animal Studies, London: Routledge, 2020, ISBN 9781003014270

Articles
Most of the books are collections of essays; the search turned up others in addition to Lundblad being cited as playing an important role in the field; all of these are reputable academic publishers. Yngvadottir (talk) 09:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Lundblad and Marianne DeKoven, "Animality and Advocacy", introduction to Species Matters, De Gruyter, 2011
 * Samantha Pergadia, "Toward Black Animality Studies", Contemporary Literature 61.3, Fall 2020

From User talk:Mlundblad, I see we also have Critical animal studies, from which it appears that term is used by those emphasizing animal rights. But I'm leaving that book above since it discusses Animality studies and may be useful for expansion. Yngvadottir (talk) 09:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)