Talk:Anne of Green Gables: The Sequel

Conflict of interest and Sullivan Entertainment promotional material
I've tagged this article as WP:COI and started trimming some of the more overtly promotional material recently added. See this discussion at WP:COIN for more details. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:39, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * There's still copyvio material in the synopsis, but adding the tag broke the rest of the page. Compare with this  Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:41, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Archived WP:COIN discussion now at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 26. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 23:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). In addition to that linked above, it also duplicated the television listing at this URL: https://www.wmht.org/pdf/outlook.pdf?PHPSESSID=9b853f1f6. It seems likely that subsequent material in the section was also duplicative. Infringing material has been rewritten and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:03, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Needs to be moved to Anne of Green Gables: The Sequel
My understanding of Wikipedia policy is the title of the article should reflect the title of country of origin; as this was produced in Canada as Anne of Green Gables: The Sequel and aired there under that title (indeed, according to the DVD featurette "The Sullivan Classic" on the recent box set release, the title Anne of Avonlea is actually factually incorrect if applied to the sequel in many respects), this article should be moved to that title and Anne of Avonlea (1987 film) be made the redirect. 68.146.64.9 (talk) 14:21, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Real Jen Pringle!
Weird, did you know that there's a real British voice actress named Jen Pringle! 8-0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:4100:1840:808:1848:808:0:7977 (talk) 22:47, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Requested move 20 March 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Moved to Anne of Green Gables: The Sequel. EdJohnston (talk) 00:59, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Anne of Avonlea (1987 film) → Anne of Green Gables: The Sequel (1987 film) – title of the article should reflect the title of country of origin as this was produced in Canada as Anne of Green Gables: The Sequel Klsoukup (talk) 23:12, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). TonyBallioni (talk) 01:34, 20 March 2017 (UTC)


 * If this is renamed, it should be to : the disambiguator “1987 film” would be redundant. Gorobay (talk) 14:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Support move to Anne of Green Gables: The Sequel – the U.S. Copyright Office has it as "Anne of Green Gables: The Sequel" --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment. Neither "should reflect the title of country of origin" nor "U.S. Copyright Office has it as" are valid reasons to move.  How about some evidence of usage in reliable English secondary sources? In any case, if it is moved, the disambiguator would be unnecessary.  --В²C ☎ 01:38, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, both the DVD cover shown here and the one at IMDb show "Anne of Green Gables: The Sequel" as the title. Also, I don't see how the "U.S. Copyright Office" can't be considered a "reliable secondary source". Finding anything else is hard – this is a 1988 letter to the "LA Times" that uses the title "Anne of Green Gables: The Sequel" which pretty strongly implies that it was the broadcast title in the U.S.. And this LA Times piece from 2000 states, "...the 1987 follow-up, "Anne of Green Gables--The Sequel." There's also this. Thus it seems pretty clear to me that this is the predominant title of this in the United States. So it would seem that "Anne of Avonlea" was the title used in Canada, though I can find even Canadian sources that refer to it as "Anne of Green Gables – The Sequel" (e.g. this). I'm guessing that Canadian sources predominantly refer to it as "Anne of Avonlea", and everyone else predominantly calls it "Anne of Green Gables: The Sequel". As I'm going to guess there are more of the latter than the former, I am currently not inclined to change my vote, especially as WP:NATURALDIS favors the proposed move over the current title. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:32, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Support move to Anne of Green Gables: The Sequel. The current title is sub-optimal for many reasons... neither concise (the date is unnecessary) nor recognisable (the plot uses material from three of the books, not just Anne of Avonlea). Andrewa (talk) 07:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anne of Green Gables: The Sequel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071214002939/http://www.ncta.com/About/About/AboutNCTA.aspx to http://www.ncta.com/About/About/AboutNCTA.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:32, 25 December 2017 (UTC)