Talk:Annie Jacobsen

Flight 327 description is weak
It portrays the government report as supporting Jacobsen and contradicting Snopes, but this is not the case. The government report is entirely consistent with Clint Taylor's much superior reporting on Flight 327. I recommend adding Clint Taylor's reporting to the references (e.g., http://spectator.org/archives/2004/08/05/rashomon-in-the-skies-the-tang) and updating the description to be more accurate. Snopes does NOT say that Jacobsen's testimony about what happened is false, it says that her conclusion that what she saw was a dry run for a terrorist attack is false, and that appears to be correct. Lippard (talk) 16:02, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

D.o.B.?
Date-of-birth is standard on Wiki pages. Valetude (talk) 02:32, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

This was very interesting
Good 24.38.200.69 (talk) 18:12, 15 March 2024 (UTC)