Talk:Antonia of Württemberg

Assessment
The German wiki is no source, IMHO. Sebastian scha. (talk) 18:04, 28 October 2009 (UTC)


 * WP:CITE does say to WP:CITE.


 * Also, for copyright reasons, I thought it was quite useful to indicate what had come from German WP.


 * But as regards the verification issue, the German article draws closely from the Landesarchiv Baden-Württemberg March/April 2005 Archivale des Monats feature, as the ref in the article cites, and that is a WP:RS. Jheald (talk) 18:29, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I always AGF, but to use a wikipedia for reference is ... discussible. For copyright reasons using the template translated here on the talk page is enough, as it's done for all translation (see also this discussion). You may add the de to the article itself.
 * Also, I doesn't question the Landesarchive source. In my opinion, it's better to link the reliable source directly (with the citation template), and if you had a look at http://www.landesarchiv-bw.de/web/45763, so this is your source. Sebastian scha. (talk) 19:00, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * OK; changed as you suggest. Jheald (talk) 22:27, 28 October 2009 (UTC)