Talk:Apennine culture

Indo-European immigration
Pallatino is completely ad-hoc phantasy: In the Neolithic, there were no IW-s. And Italic has by far more connections with Celtic than with Greek, thus, this theory is nonsense. HJJHolm (talk) 15:14, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

The relationship between Italic and Celtic languages is unproven. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.128.225.124 (talk) 18:14, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Age
3050±2000 BC is an unidentifiable typo. HJJHolm (talk) 07:35, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Moreover, the dates given here differ extremely from those in the it.wikipedia. Whom can we trust? HJJHolm (talk) 09:12, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Imputations of ethnicity
Pallattino's hypotheses are outdated and far outsiede of all modern assumptions of linguistic relationship. In particular, the Italic Indo-European language group is related either close to Celtic or Germanic, not to Greek, wich is clearly an Eastern Indo-European Sub-Group. He and the writer of this article has no evidence whatever for the contents. HJJHolm (talk) 07:50, 6 April 2012 (UTC)