Talk:Apo Reef

The UNESCO World Heritage Infobox should not be used for tentative sites. It confuses the reader, especially those who do not read or notice the fine print "(tentative)" in the Infobox. Readers may think that it is actually a UNESCO World Heritage Site when it is not. Second, the tentative listing is not a UNESCO nod. It simply means that the country wants to nominate it. In the case of the Philippines, it will take years or even decades for the site to be listed, if ever it is listed at all. If one wants to highlight the tentative list, a new Infobox should be created for it, with a clear indication that it is only in the tentative list and not a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Phlheritage (talk) 16:38, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

References to be integrated

 * ,, , , and  Shrumster 08:58, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Apo Reef. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006073532/http://bmb.gov.ph/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=81%3Aregion-4b&catid=69%3Aregions to http://bmb.gov.ph/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=81%3Aregion-4b&catid=69%3Aregions

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC)