Talk:Arbitration clause

Removed original research
I removed the following content from the article:

The text I removed has significant problems with WP:NPOV, WP:UNDUE, WP:NOR, and WP:V. Hopefully we should be able to rewrite this material so that the article can contain appropriate material on the enforceability of arbitration clauses. RJaguar3 &#124; u &#124; t 17:08, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

On the topic of weasel words
"it is presumed" is tagged "by whom". I think it's pretty clear in this context that "it is presumed by the court" but without an explicit source I wouldn't make the edit myself but rather suggest the edit. 24.16.205.24 (talk) 17:56, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Arbitration clause. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081202143357/http://www.lcia-arbitration.com:80/ to http://www.lcia-arbitration.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:33, 17 October 2016 (UTC)