Talk:Arnold Hunter

Semi-protected edit request on 25 February 2016
The poor performance of Arnold Hunter on February 25, 2016, with at least 3 critical errors should be mentioned in the article.

Johnny98765 (talk) 21:34, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * And when/if the press starts reporting this, so that there are reliable sources, I'm sure a proportionate mention will be included. —S MALL  JIM   22:05, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

http://www.nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20160225_02150441

http://www.sudinfo.be/1500548/article/2016-02-25/arnold-hunter-l-arbitre-d-olympiacos-anderlecht-fait-les-joies-de-la-toile-photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1811:B63C:F300:7915:E6F8:EEF7:625E (talk) 07:06, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

I would suggest the following addition:

On February 25, 2016 his performance during the match Olympiakos-Anderlecht was heavily criticised. He made at least 4 controversial decisions, of which 3 in favour of Olympiakos, that could have been decisive for the outcome of the game.,  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnny98765 (talk • contribs) 10:19, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * He was only criticized in Belgium because a Belgian team was involved in the match and was the recipient of the "incorrect" decisions. We should not write a piece on his performance based on Belgian sources because they are not impartial in any respect. Tvx1 15:08, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Padlock-silver-open.svg Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Datbubblegumdoe[talk – contribs] 22:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --91.176.106.27 (talk) 22:29, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

gros con!!! corompu

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --Karma-AH (talk) 23:18, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

If a football player plays 1 minute in a professional competition, he is allowed to have his own Wikipedia article. So if a match referee becomes the center of attention after a professional football competition match, why would it not be allowed to have an article on the referee? Besides, Northern Irish media have also picked up this story. Karma-AH (talk) 23:18, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Notability should not only allegedly exist in the sources, it should also be demonstrated in the article. Simply stating that he is employed by a notable organization or company is not enough. That's like claiming that any BMW employee should have a wikipedia article just because BMW is incredibly notable. Tvx1 23:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, then I think Marcus Rashford should also be put up for a speedy deletion. He is only known because he plays for Manchester United, scored two goals and made the press by that. Karma-AH (talk) 09:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)