Talk:Arnold Resnicoff

No NPOV here
I don't think I've ever seen an article so obviously written by its subject or someone close to him. The article needs heavy editing to be considered encyclopedic. Scrawlspacer (talk) 12:58, 29 November 2010 (UTC)


 * On 13 December 2010 I wrote a message to Scrawlspacer on his/her talk page: "Arnold Resnicoff".  I thought to ask Scrawlspacer to tell me which parts are NOT "neutral", but I noticed that he/she wrote that the article "needs heavy editing to be considered encyclopedic". So, I decided to contact Scrawlspacer on his/her talk page to know, more precisely, what are his thoughts about that.  Since I have not yet received a reply, I removed (today, 22 December 2010) the POV from the article as per point 2: "Discussions about neutrality issues have stopped (for more than a few days)" (it never started) ... and point 3: "The problems in the article have been resolved" (I think — and I really hope — I have resolved all the problems in the article) of the When to remove section in the template documentation. Happy editing! –p joe f (talk • contribs) 12:52, 22 December 2010 (UTC)