Talk:Arnold van den Bergh

Appropriate?
Oof. I'm really not sure this article is appropriate, at the present time. At the moment, all we have on this person's notability is a speculative study that suggests they -may- have been involved in the betrayal of the Frank family. I don't feel that's enough to go on. If anything, I'd suggest this information be worked into the existing Anne Frank article, until such time as more concrete information is available to warrant its own article. Striker force Talk 17:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Objection withdrawn, with the expansion of the article. Striker force Talk 16:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Clean-up tags
WP:WTRMT states that tags should be removed "When an article talkpage discussion has not been initiated". Consequently, I plan to remove the tags added two weeks ago in a subsequent edit to the article. (Feel free to re-add along with detailed reasoning on this Talk: page.) —Sladen (talk) 10:43, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't mind removal of tags, however when I have a chance I will be removing passages that I believe are not supported by adequate sourcing. Whether the tags are there are not is secondary to the sourcing issue.Coretheapple (talk) 16:34, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for contributing to the article Talk: page. All editors are welcome to initiate WP:BOLD edits.  Usually the standard WP:BRD cycle is then followed, culminating in a discussion phase on the relevant article Talk: page.  One can also initiate a discussion directly by stating (ie. specifically and exactly) which precise sentence or sentences could be tweaked and improved.  —Sladen (talk) 11:22, 21 February 2022 (UTC)  ( See also request for being precise made during Articles for deletion/Arnold van den Bergh (notary) discussion)