Talk:Arsenical bronze

Essay
This independent essay needs to be brought into Wikipedia, partly through links.--Wetman 07:03, 17 November 2008 (UTC)


 * What? Globbet (talk) 20:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * See the previous revision of the page. Unfortunately I don't believe that the contents were salvageable, and the style was so different from Wikipedia's norms that I couldn't be sure that it hadn't been copied here from elsewhere. For this reason I reverted to the previous stub version. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

What does this mean ?
"There are no real advantages metallurgically for the superiority of tin bronze."

And this: "arsenical copper, being defined as copper with under 0.5 wt% As, below the accepted percentage in archaeological artefacts."

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arsenical bronze. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100407150412/http://www.sican.org/results.html to http://www.sican.org/results.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:57, 9 July 2017 (UTC)