Talk:Artemis Fowl

Requested move 21 December 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: pages moved. (non-admin closure) Steel1943  (talk) 18:40, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

– Since every use of "Artemis Fowl" relates to this series, having a disambiguation page at the base title seems a disservice to readers. Compare to Harry Potter or The Fast and the Furious, for example. --BDD (talk) 18:23, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Artemis Fowl (series) → Artemis Fowl
 * Artemis Fowl → Artemis Fowl (disambiguation)
 * Support, per nom. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:21, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Support But I don't think the disambiguation page should even exist. It would be rather non-controversial for the admin to delete it and just move the page to the main namespace.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:25, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * There are still three topics with standalone articles that could be referred to as "Artemis Fowl" alone—the series, the first book, and the protagonist. I don't think deletion would serve any good. --BDD (talk) 16:26, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * The series page would encompass and link to the other two, perhaps with a hatnote if necessary. Therefore the disambiguation page is pointless as they are not wholly unrelated topics. The only reason Harry Potter has one is because of the journalist of the same name.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 21:24, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Support - Nomination is reasonable, Harry Potter comparison is highly valid. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 19:14, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Support as proposed. Keeping the disambiguation page as a separate page is harmless. bd2412  T 14:17, 24 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.