Talk:Artemis and the Stag

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Artemis and the Stag. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100201064312/http://artvoice.com/issues/v6n8/war_against_the_albright_knox to http://artvoice.com/issues/v6n8/war_against_the_albright_knox
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081123012835/http://www.artsjournal.com/man/2007/03/reexamining_deaccessioning_at.html to http://www.artsjournal.com/man/2007/03/reexamining_deaccessioning_at.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:39, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Needs an update
The page says the statue is on display at the Met as of October, 2019. Still there? Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 04:20, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Why so little about its origin and provenance?
Such a large and important sculpture from antiquity deserves more said about its history, rediscovery and provenance than just "The sculpture...is believed to have been made some time between the 1st century BC and the 1st century AD. It was originally excavated in the 1920s from a construction site in Rome and has since changed hands several times before finding a home at the Albright-Knox Art Gallery..." An entire book was published about the history of the Venus de Milo. Surely a few more sentences are warranted here for this highly significant work of art. Bricology (talk) 05:14, 12 June 2023 (UTC)