Talk:Astrological sign

Astrological sign for graphic designers
Some artists/designers referring to this Wikipedia page might still find it difficult to reproduce the astrological signs in high-resolution details. I've found an easy way. Would someone familiar with this article please include this info in the article (in the proper place and style)?

To produce the 12 signs in a Windows environment, input "^_`abcdefghi" and apply the "Wingdings" font. Voila, you can enlarge to say 50 point font, and output your graphic file to EPS/PNG/JPG format for very fine graphic details.

I will try to demonstrate it here:

^_`abcdefghi.

Regards, Jason — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.187.188.153 (talk • contribs) August 9, 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 March 2024
Hi team,

This morning, I read a page in our encyclopedia about the astrological signs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrological_sign#References) and when I reached the end of the page in the  references section, I saw a thing that was not relevant and not good in our pages (in my point of view). In the fourth point, we had a link on the keyword " Signs and Constellations" and it's broken. So please replace this for a better experience also I have a suggestion for a good and informative page (https://www.astroyogi.com/zodiac-signs)

Thanks Astrosir Astrosir (talk) 07:46, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * No. Wikipedia is not a platform for the promotion of random astrological websites. AndyTheGrump (talk) 07:54, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 June 2024
I think this new scientific study could be added to this page. Please someone add it to the pargaraph starting with "Astrology is a pseudoscience....".

i suggest this:

Astrology is a pseudoscience.[3] Scientific investigations of the theoretical[4] basis and experimental verification of claims[5] have shown it to have no scientific validity or explanatory power. A scientific study, for example, found that zodiac signs are no better than random numbers in predicting life outcomes (citation)"

The sun's position at birth is unrelated to subjective well-being: Debunking astrological claims https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12395 Astroresearchh (talk) 07:52, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * . This citation might be a better fit at Astrology. This article is mostly about the astrological signs themselves. 〜 Askarion   ✉  17:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 June 2024
I believe the Gemini dates (start date specifically) is incorrect, I am 99.9% sure and I only know this because my mom and I are both Gemini and her birthday is May 21st.

The line should be changed FROM: Gemini	The Twins		♊︎	22 May	21 June

TO: Gemini	The Twins		♊︎	21 May	21 June Sirena.blanch (talk) 08:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: Note the qualifiers: "approximate dates", "the start date of all signs can change slightly from year to year". Hyphenation Expert (talk) 09:40, 6 June 2024 (UTC)