Talk:Atheism Conquered

Untitled
Most of this article is a copy-paste from Inquisition. And the only original part at the begginning has an inappropiate style for wikipedia. -- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 (Talk: here- commons- es) 14:45, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

I agree, but as I looked up this article from reading Robert Greene's book, perhaps Tommaso's greatest claim to fame in the english speaking world is now this reference Zfishwiki (talk) 19:50, 20 August 2010 (UTC)


 * But the article barely mentions the book, and focuses on the various inquisitions instead. Articles should remain mostly on-topic, and content on other topics belong in their own articles, and can be linked to if necessary.  I came to this article looking for information on the content and arguments of that book, and found nothing of value here.  Whether that reference is Tommaso's greatest claim to fame or not has nothing to do with the almost completely off-topic nature of this article on that book.  --  Hi  Ev  02:15, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

".... a book attacking free-thinkers, Machiavellians, Calvinists, and heretics of all stripes." This article is very good yoke! Are anyone read what Robert Greene realy writen in his "The 48 Laws of Power"?--Ivo Vahur (talk) 06:59, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

He does say that but also goes on to explain that it is really cover for his true ideals. Rather than publish a book where he expresses his inflammatory views (see what happened last time) he made it a series of arguments in which the catholic side ostensibly won but where the "free thinker" arguments are expressed so well that it became a sort of free thinker handbook. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.66.35.230 (talk) 16:49, 12 February 2011 (UTC)