Talk:Atlantis: The Lost Empire/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Swarm  u 04:34, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Review is pending. Please be patient. :) Swarm  u 04:34, 20 August 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Review in progress Swarm  u 15:10, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * No concerns here
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Content reliably and properly sourced.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The breadth of this article is impressive.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * Are there problems with any particular images within the article that you would like to see addressed? DrNegative (talk) 18:48, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I removed the non-free video game cover pic as it didn't have a good rationale and didn't really add anything to the section anyway. DrNegative (talk) 18:54, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Apologies, DrNegative, I had to pause mid-review and hadn't gotten to the images yet&mdash; the gray icons are just the default placeholders. However, I was going to raise the topic of the heavy use of non-free images, but it seems you've beat me to the punch by taking care of that problem! Other than that, the images are all appropriately licensed and captioned, and the non-free images are of appropriate resolution and have fair use rationales, so no other concerns. I'm going to list the article. Regards, Swarm  u 19:28, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your review. DrNegative (talk) 19:40, 22 August 2011 (UTC)