Talk:Auckland University Students' Association

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Auckland Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Auckland, which aims to improve the coverage of Auckland, New Zealand, on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.AucklandWikipedia:WikiProject AucklandTemplate:WikiProject AucklandWikiProject Auckland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Redirect[edit]

The contents of this page were already duplicated in the University of Auckland article. Furthermore, in line with precedents/consensus that individual universities' chapters of students' unions are not notable except in ver few cases, the redirect is placed to facilitate navigation only. Organic growth can take place in the University's page. Ohconfucius 04:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I dispute the redirect of this article. AUSA is clearly a separate entity from University of Auckland. This article has been maintained by numerous editors. The correct course of action would have been to put a merge tag on both article and wait for a week or two for feedback. It appears you did not in fact merge the articles; you state above that this article was duplicated in the UoA article, but in fact this article has significant content not at UoA.-gadfium 05:19, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, any notion that AUSA and UoA are one and the same is absurd. They have different reasons for existing and often butt heads on important matters. Mattlore 06:58, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portfolios[edit]

For whoever reversed changes, WRO and CAO have both changed around. Ask any UoA Student who takes any form of interest in AUSA 203.109.251.118 07:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Names: Daniel Sloan is known as the IV, this is incorrect on the AUSA website, as is Joe McCrory, I believe it was Joe himself who edited the name prior. Just because its listed on the AUSA website does not mean its correct. Sigh typical wikipedia nazi's. 60.234.150.239 (talk) 22:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If the AUSA website is inaccurate, then get it changed, or cite a more reliable source. Does the New Zealand Herald publish information about portfolio positions? If there is no reliable source, then we should not be listing the portfolio holders here.-gadfium 23:00, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Auckland University Students' Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:59, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]