Talk:Audio forensics

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Audio forensics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120408153708/http://www.wired.com:80/science/discoveries/news/2007/10/audio_forensics? to http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2007/10/audio_forensics

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:01, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Article review
Very well written article ! :) Antonelse (talk) 12:39, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Review
The article is very well written and develops a very interesting overview of audio forensics. I only have a couple of observations: perhaps you want to replace "Main article: ..." with the See also tag; and maybe I would change Audio Enhancement to Audio enhancement for capitalization consistency with the content of the section. SlipherD (talk) 14:10, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Article Review
Well done article! Easy to understand and well written in language and form. :) Fpalmese (talk) 14:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Observations and suggestions for improvements
The following observations and suggestions for improvements were collected, following expert review of the article within the Science, Technology, Society and Wikipedia course at the Politecnico di Milano, in June 2022.

The article is well written and well organized, exploiting both sections and figures. Audio Forensics sub-tasks are correctly defined following a categorization accepted in the literature. I only have one minor concern: the rise of deepfakes in the last couple of years has pushed the forensic community also towards detecting synthetic speech. This could have been cited within the "authenticty" section as it is becoming more and more relevant.

Other comments: - Maybe it makes sense to reference the "Forensic video analysis" page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forensic_video_analysis) - If anything about synthetic speech detection is added, it may make sense to refernece the "Speech synthesis" page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speech_synthesis) - It may be worth noting that recent advancements also include extensive use of deep learning and not just signal processing

--BarettoDiArchitettura (talk) 08:35, 21 July 2022 (UTC)