Talk:Aurunci Mountains

No TOC?
Hello there Attlios. I see you have suppressed the TOC, no doubt because the article is currently very short. I would say, tentatively fine. Tentatively. I plan an expansion of course and you can see that I have already started it. As a longer article it might need a TOC. It also needs more photos, but more text would be required for that also. I don't know how long the expansion will take me, and I'm not sure where the TOC threshold is. I'm open to suggestion. We customarily have TOC's but there is some liberty for design. I imagine the design will change a few times. So, I'm just letting you know I'm aware of your design actions and how that might or might not impact the expansion. I suppose the same might be said of the other members of the Volscian Chain and a few other topographic articles concerning the region. I am aiming at Latium and related. Obviously we are just getting started on these. Ciao.Dave (talk) 12:32, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The article has now sufficient body to have a TOC. When I arrived on the article for the first time just now I was very puzzled by the absence of a TOC. I will restore it.Ludwig Boltzmann (talk) 08:20, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Aurunci Mountains. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927174151/http://www.lincei.it/pubblicazioni/rendicontiFMN/rol/pdf/S2000-01-02.pdf to http://www.lincei.it/pubblicazioni/rendicontiFMN/rol/pdf/S2000-01-02.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:08, 21 October 2016 (UTC)