Talk:Austenasia

Improvement template
So.. what are these "multiple issues"? Qwertyuiop1994 (talk) 14:45, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Merge
The individual, Jonathan Austen has absolutely no notability outside of his role in this micronation. His article is very questionable regarding WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Therefore, the articles should probably be merged. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  03:15, 26 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Remain:I'd have to disagree, outside of Austenasia, he is a relatively well known micronationalist and public figure in the community. I think it should stay and I see this page in the same vain as Travis McHenry's article, but I can understand why some would want it merged.--BestOnLifeform (talk) 19:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Merge: While I know Jonothan and do believe he is a partially notable micronationalist, he has no relevance being on Wikipedia, unlike Austenasia. Besides, there are so many issues with this article that it seems people have no interest in resolving. Therefore, I support the merge. Jamez517 (talk) 17:12, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: I am curious then, on your opinion of him having the article merged whilst say Travis McHenry maintains his article? Just curious.--BestOnLifeform (talk) 19:39, 17 November 2020 (UTC) p.s. I do see and understand your decision making.
 * Merge. This seems like a nonnotable individual outside this micronation website community. The whole situation with Austenasia is like an internet joke. Liz Read! Talk! 03:22, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge The subject is not relevant outside of Austenasia, and most sources are of the micronation and not the person himself. Especially so when there are no pages of more notable micronationalists such as Kevin Baugh. ABCGoreng (talk) 08:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Reply: ABCGoreng, not necessarily true, see Travis McHenry. --BestOnLifeform (talk) 21:03, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Reply: Micronationalism isn’t necessarily an “internet joke”. BalladeCracker (talk) 08:57, 28 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Merge WP:GNG Articles should be merged. No amount of improvements to his article will suddenly make Jonathan Austen notable.--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 01:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge Per WP:GNG, Austen has not achieved widespread notability outside of Austenasia. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 19:09, 11 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge Per WP:GNG, while Austenasia may be notable, the 'Emperor' clearly isn't. Therefore, this article should be merged into the Austenasia article. Acc013 (talk) 04:45, 12 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge Per WP:GNG, as above. Katechon08 (talk) 20:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ Seven merge, one remain Anonymous 7481 (talk) 22:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:37, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Jonathan Austen 2017.jpg