Talk:Back at the Barnyard

This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-12-27. The result of the discussion was Merge to Barnyard (film).

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Nickelodeon task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Animation: American / Television / Computer Mid‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Anime[edit]

NOOOOO!! I loved this show, and now it's ruined! I need to know if this is just vandalism, after all, the person had no citation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.97.36.226 (talk) 17:36, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Existince[edit]

Is there any website that prooves that this actually exists?

Narfbite 17:55, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[1][2] seem to mention this. Although this is somewhat crystal balling which should be avoided. Weregerbil 12:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's on the Barnyard DVD for fall 2007. 91 BOY | talk 22:01, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move page[edit]

Is it OK to move this article to Barnyard: The Series? 91 BOY | talk 22:39, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong name[edit]

The series isnt Back at the barnyard, its Back TO the barnyard! It said so in an issue of Nick magazine. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.176.130.15 (talk) 17:29, August 20, 2007 (UTC)

nope your wrong it is back at the barnyard —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.197.5.190 (talk) 10:51, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Snotty Boy[edit]

Isn't his name Eugene? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.214.203.72 (talk) 18:22, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 No it's Bob.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.86.24.249 (talk) 05:04, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy section?[edit]

Shouldn't a controversy section been added? many parents don't like the fact that some of the cows are "male". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.109.74.182 (talk) 16:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a parent whose children watch the show, I personally don't have a problem that some of the cows are male -- it's that for some idiot reason they've added udders to them. Apparently this was originally done in the film Barnyard "for fun"; fair enough, I guess, but it is about as "humorous" as having drivers in a US-based show drive on the left side of the road "for fun" -- there's not really anything funny about it and all it does is confuse kids. I'm sure there are people who read way, way too much into the whole male-cows-with-udders thing and any opposition to it, but I just think its flat-out stupid. I wouldn't be surprised if it really was a byproduct of some animator, director or producer not knowing any better and once they discovered the truth they just went with it. --75.70.199.111 (talk) 18:55, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of Citations[edit]

Has anyone around here noticed this article's lack of citations? Very much references need to be added, if you don't want the article to be tagged (which I've already done). Joseph Dynamite (BLOW UP OR BUST! 20:59 (UTC)

A dude that keeps on removing my edit[edit]

Stop removing my edit Killerboy29912 (talk) 05:15, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's unsourced, it's not a minor edit, and I question whether we need to mention when a show aired in reruns on one particular channel. Meters (talk) 05:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How do you source it Killerboy29912 (talk) 19:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

already answered this user elsewhere. Meters (talk) 19:49, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong information currently in "plot" section[edit]

Oct 17,2020 Has anyone noticed that the "plot" section of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Back_at_the_Barnyard is lifted entirely from the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_Tendency and has nothing to do with the Back at the Barnyard page? Is this an error or sabotage? Can it be reverted to a version that has to do with the subject at hand? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8800:2B80:1E3C:E8F6:80CB:7A8E:E8C5 (talk) 05:21, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]