Talk:Baden-Württemberg-class frigate

Displacement
It says, it's got the highest displacement among destroyer class ships and the displacement is given at 7,200 tonnes. On the page of Arleigh Burke class it says, those got more than 8,000 tonnes. This gives some sort of inconsistency, meaning either a) the allegation "biggest displacement" is incorrect, b) Baden-Württemberg is not a destroyer class ship, c) Arleigh Burkes are not destroyer class ships, d) the displacement tonnages given on either the Arleigh Burke or this article are incorrect. e) any combination of aforementioned

15:30, 6 December 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A0A:A541:7D73:0:8C10:F5FA:FB4D:4A42 (talk)

UPDATE NEEDED!
This article is woefully inadequate. The external links contain abundant information on this class, including the rationale behind its atypical weapons fit. With no context, it is not obvious what these ships are meant to do, and that might lead to significant misunderstandings. I gather there is an underlying controversy as well, and it isn't reflected at all in this page. I'd update the page myself, but surely SOMEONE knows more than what I learned in 15 minutes on naval-technology, and I'm not really familiar with that particular source. 66.68.88.116 (talk) 01:12, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Untitled
News says they are actually going to build this thing. I was surprised, as it looks such a strange design. Why shore bombardment if you haven't got any amphibs? If you want some intervention capability, something like the Mistral class landing platform dock looks like much better value for money. Leibniz 12:35, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

They are more thinking along the lines of fire support for SOF-style operations and limited tactical strikes against high-value targets. This is also in line with the F125s projected mission as part of "stabilization" and sea control elements rather than high-intensity naval and amphibious warfare. The German navy certainly does not plan to aquire a comprehensive shore bombardment capability since it lacks any amphibious elements as you have pointed out. Also a single 127 mm mount is not exactly what you would need for any sustained fire support. 220.245.10.65 (talk)

Image
We need one. Dfrg.m s c 1. 2 . 3 08:47, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

K-130
"According to news in May 2009, during the first test of the "Oldenburg" a screw fell into the transmission, causing serious damage. More research has shown several major design flaws in the swiss engine transmissions. All five ships have been shut down. Current estimates of the ships entering service are 2011 (planned was the first ship seeing active service in May 2007)."

The "Oldenburg" is a K-130-class ship and has nothing to do with the F-125-class. I´m not a native english-speaker, so i don´t want to edit. But somebody should, thx. --82.82.139.68 (talk) 13:21, 24 May 2009 (UTC)


 * paragrapgh removedNevfennas (talk) 17:11, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Air Defence SAM Capability
Any idea what AA capability F125 got ???

I can see two RAM launchers (CIWS) would be funny to have such limited air defence? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.220.53.72 (talk) 11:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

- These frigates will be specialised for stabilisation missions, thus extensive AA capability is not needed. The RAM launchers provide sufficient self-defense. The main gun has an AA-role, too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.37.84.225 (talk) 09:39, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/f125-frigate/
 * Triggered by  on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

✅ This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Blohm+Voss link is a also a 404! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.24.180.147 (talk) 20:26, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on F125-class frigate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927203251/http://www.abcmoney.co.uk/news/04200751286.htm to http://www.abcmoney.co.uk/news/04200751286.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:58, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Baden-Württemberg-class frigate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150130023758/http://www.newsletter-verteidigung.de/freie-newsletter/freie-nv-inhalte-2014/file/281-nv-ausgabe-01-2014.html to http://www.newsletter-verteidigung.de/freie-newsletter/freie-nv-inhalte-2014/file/281-nv-ausgabe-01-2014.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140727233111/http://seefahrer.blog.de/2013/02/06/fregatte-nrw-bericht-kiellegung-15506450/ to http://seefahrer.blog.de/2013/02/06/fregatte-nrw-bericht-kiellegung-15506450/
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130118183627/http://www.blohmvoss-naval.com/en/class-125.html to http://www.blohmvoss-naval.com/en/class-125.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:36, 7 December 2017 (UTC)