Talk:Baglafecht weaver

Concolorous or concolourous
I had thought the same thing about concolourous, that it was a standard British spelling of concolorous, it's even in some dictionaries as an option. I did a Google Ngram on it and found that even in British English it's almost never used. See https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=concolorous%2Cconcolourous&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=18&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cconcolorous%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cconcolourous%3B%2Cc0. Does that make sense to you? Thanks, SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨   16:14, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * yes that makes sense. Quetzal1964 18:28, 27 March 2017 (UTC)