Talk:Barbara Kingsolver/Archive 2

Fresh start to the talk page
I'm in the process of updating this article, and greatly expanding it as well. I've put the old discussion (which was quite minimal, and didn't contain any pertinent content disputes etc) in an archive. Jhfortier (talk) 03:46, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Literary Themes
Although I think this section is important, it is nearly impossible to find citations, and I'm pretty sure that writing what I think the literary themes would be original researcher. I'm just going to remove that section, and if I stumble across some references on her literary themes I'll re-add it. I'd like to take this article to GA at some point, and that section will just get scrapped. Jhfortier (talk) 19:41, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Where to put the Bellwether prize?
Spanglej recently moved the Bellwether prize section out of the "Hono u rs"section and put it as a standalone subsection. Although I think it was better suited where it was, I wouldn't mind some additional input; should it be standalone? It doesn't seem to have enough information to really hold up on its own, in my opinion, but what does everyone else thing? Additionally, should the "local eating experiment" go under the writing career (it IS a book) or under personal life? Jhfortier (Talk · contribs ) 03:57, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Theological Criticism
mormon.org is not a reliable source for theological criticism. Furthermore, neither goodreads nor "anonymous blogger[s]" can be cited. Nice try, though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.130.167.73 (talk) 16:12, 12 May 2014 (UTC)


 * To state what religious groups are saying is not NPOV. The editor was not arguing for or against what they had written. I think mormon.org is fine as a primary source, if just used to demonstrate what the group think, not as part of an argument within the article. See WP:PSTS. Reporting criticism of a subject is fine by the guidelines. The editor did not add the specific page from the Mormon site that mentions Kingsolver. Anna (talk) 11:53, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Barbara Kingsolver. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110615125302/http://www.st-charles.lib.il.us/readers_service/bios/kingsolver.htm to http://www.st-charles.lib.il.us/readers_service/bios/kingsolver.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121006000932/http://www.pen.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/6004 to http://www.pen.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/6004

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:08, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Barbara Kingsolver. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100511142111/http://www.dukenews.duke.edu/2008/05/kingsolver.html to http://www.dukenews.duke.edu/2008/05/kingsolver.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:17, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Criticism
The criticism section is just right-biased personal attacks. "Syrupy"? I'll remove it if no one objects, but it will probably be all of it, since I don't see much worth salvaging. — dorianha bogelund  «talk»  14:04, 14 February 2019 (UTC)