Talk:Bare-faced bulbul

Scientific name
The order and family shouldn't be identical to the genus and species. I think the source made a mistake. But until I get better info, that's what I put in the taxobox. Grundle2600 (talk) 05:21, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

I removed the genus and species. The source is almost certainly wrong. When better info is found, it can be added. Grundle2600 (talk) 05:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

The official name is Pycnonotus hualon. Source Grundle2600 (talk) 05:58, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

DYK
Unfortunate that the mistake in a single reference has multiplied and also was featured in the DYK. Especially considering that the text in the article itself was corrected almost a week before the DYK, and that the primary source, the actual description of the species, specifically mentioned that it was not the only with a bare face. 212.10.93.167 (talk) 17:01, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Bare-faced bulbul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120226205349/http://www.orientalbirdclub.org/publications/forktail/25/WoxvoldDuckworthTimmins-Bulbul.pdf to http://www.orientalbirdclub.org/publications/forktail/25/WoxvoldDuckworthTimmins-Bulbul.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:12, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

We should update the genus
a new genus is for this species, sister to hemixos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.91.210.184 (talk) 22:28, 9 June 2018 (UTC)