Talk:Battle of Camp Hill

February 2010
I reverted this edit because it was not formatted properly and because it was a quote from a primary source. I had considered including something similar but I could not find a reliable secondary source that drew that conclusion from the wording of this primary source so I did not include it.

I found several books that quoted the passage (it is from "The third [listed in the article], dated 1 May 1643, is a strong Parliamentary production, possibly the most savage of all") and they are listed in the article see also for example Stuart England by Angus Stroud p. 105 that also includes the rape or as the source puts it "beastly assaulted many women's chastity and impudently made their brags afterwards how many they had ravished". But this is from a biased pamphlet and unless an historian says it happened or quotes it as happing then we can not use it. -- PBS (talk) 13:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Newman University
There used to be a number of sources published by Newman University Some of them contained OCR errors and most of them of these sources are either in this article on or on Wikisource. -- PBS (talk) 18:50, 15 June 2015 (UTC)