Talk:Battle of the Head of Passes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2010[edit]

I noticed this article was pretty much blank while adding material to the "Battle of Fort Jackson and St. Philip" article. With the reference material at hand it was easy to throw some stuff under this heading. Frank (talk) 23:38, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tone[edit]

This article has inappropriate tone problems. It reads like a chapter out of a book, not an encyclopedia aricle. These types of statements are strewn throughout the article: "The final comic opera touch to the woes of the Union fleet was a mistaken signal in the last phase of the gun battle."; "Although staffed with a courageous crew..." It could also use more secondary sourcing and more citations in general. Novaseminary (talk) 02:46, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There has been no consensus on the supposed problems of the article. Rewrites and additional content will be added in the future. Frank (talk) 01:10, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I very much agree about the tonal issues. Mr. Fat Wiki (talk) 17:48, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of the Head of Passes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:15, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]