Talk:Bell 309 KingCobra

WPMILHIST Assessment
Good pics and specs; the article is a bit bottom-heavy though. That is to say, specs and details of model numbers and all this technical stuff is great, but the "main" content, particularly the introduction, needs to be cleaned up a bit. Right now, the introduction reads as introductory sentences to two separate articles, and short sentences at that. Expand upon how the two are related and why they're significant, for a start. LordAmeth 01:40, 29 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above assessment is from before the Bell 309 was split off from the Bell YAH-63 to its own page. - BillCJ 00:04, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Bell 409 section
Should the 409 section stay as a legacy thing or delete it? -Fnlayson 23:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and cut the 409 section down to a couple legacy sentences. Add info back if you want. - Fnlayson 00:19, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * No problem. I didn't intend for the whole thing to stay, just hand't got around to redacting it yet. I'll look at it later, and see if there's anything else we can back. - BillCJ

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bell 309 KingCobra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070807001809/http://www.vectorsite.net/avcobra_1.html to http://www.vectorsite.net/avcobra_1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:50, 17 July 2017 (UTC)