Talk:Benelux Tour

Name
Is the current name "Eneco Tour of Benelux" the right one? The official website and the uci calender give as name "Eneco Tour". Also most cycling-dedicated website, such as cyclingnews and cyclingwebsite, use this name, although this is not consistent. Cyclingnews.com uses "eneco tour of benelux" for the editions until 2007, and cyclingwebsite has as main name "benelux tour".

The number of google hits are:


 * "eneco tour" -benelux: 192000


 * "eneco tour of benelux": 4870


 * "eneco tour of the benelux": 240 (I included this because this makes more sense to my grammatical senses.)

I have never seen it reported as "eneco tour of the benelux" in Dutch newspapers. Is it used in that way in English newspapers? If not, I would suggest we use the official shorter name "Eneco Tour". --EdgeNavidad (talk) 15:00, 19 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Djharrity moved it three years ago, saying, "most publications/references use the entire Eneco Tour of Benelux (otherwise, it would be akin to Amgen Tour (for Amgen Tour of California))". I'm not struck by that reasoning, it should be on the most common name used elsewhere in English. Google results in English suggest:


 * "eneco tour" -benelux -wikipedia 10,700 of which 521 of the first 1000 are unique
 * "eneco tour of benelux" -wikipedia 138
 * "eneco tour of the benelux" -wikipedia 17


 * I think that makes it quite clear. SeveroTC 18:37, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Eneco Tour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110914131734/http://www.memoire-du-cyclisme.net:80/etapes/eta_eneco_tour.php to http://www.memoire-du-cyclisme.net/etapes/eta_eneco_tour.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:49, 24 December 2016 (UTC)