Talk:Bessie Smith

Profiles In Hue By George D. Johnson
I've just been checking the dates of birth given in the article, and the clearest source I found was Profiles In Hue By George D. Johnson. I noted a similarity in wording between that source and our article. The book was first published in 2011. On checking the article, the information and wording pre-dates that publication, so it appears that either George D. Johnson copied our article, or that he wrote our article before publishing his book.  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  11:27, 18 April 2017 (UTC)


 * SilkTork, the book's publisher, Xlibris, is a self-publishing and vanity press. The book's copyright page states that most of its text was copied from Wikipedia. Not a reliable source, I'm afraid.


 * My impression is that some of the uncited facts in this article are supported by Chris Albertson's Bessie. Albertson used to edit this article many years ago, although he hasn't been around in more than eight years, according to his contribution history (although he may contribute periodically as an IP). The Google Books preview isn't very good, but at Amazon I see that the census isn't mentioned in the 2003 "revised and expanded edition" of the book, which says her date of birth "will probably never be verified" for lack of historical records, but cites April 15, 1894, the date on her 1923 application for a marriage license, as "probably correct" (page 7). Another editor may have added the bit about the census, or maybe Albertson found it in subsequent research. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:20, 19 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for that info. Early versions of this article are rather direct on what might have happened, for example, from December 2006: "" But, plausible though this is, there are no sources to back this up. I think it is more likely the mother would know the birthdate than the sister, but I also find it odd that the sister didn't know either the month or the year and made such a random guess. Odd that the censor taker allowed this when they would have had the previous data to check against. Given that Bessie would have been eight in 1900 according to the original data, she would have known her own birthday month and age. What eight year old doesn't know that? How would she have forgotten her own birthday and age ten years later? Speculation as to how and why there are two dates is pretty futile at this distance. I think neutral wording is what is needed, with no weighting either way. And a reliable source - clearly not Profiles In Hue By George D. Johnson!  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  07:10, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I've removed the Profiles In Hue source.  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  07:56, 19 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The most reliable and most thoroughly researched secondary source - usually - on blues musicians' birth and death details is Blues - A Regional Experience by Eagle and LeBlanc. Their entry (p.50) is here, with a footnote (#74) on p.423 here.  That states her month of birth as July 1892, but also refers to the April 1894 date.  The date of April 15, 1894 is not - despite what some sources say - given in the 1910 census, which simply gives her age in years at the census date (April 16, 1910) as 16.  (For anyone with access to Ancestry.com records, the census form itself is here.)  The April 15 date comes from her 1923 marriage certificate.  So far as this article is concerned, the best solution (as is done in many other cases where the details are uncertain) is to explain the uncertainty (if necessary, in a footnote), and give both dates so that the reader can assess the information for themselves - see These are not original research.   Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:17, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Digital remastering citation
Currently the article has a section about Digital Remasters that claims, "Given those historic limitations, the current digitally remastered versions of her work deliver significant improvements in the sound quality of Smith's performances. Some critics believe that the American Columbia Records compact disc releases are somewhat inferior to subsequent transfers made by the late John R. T. Davies for Frog Records.[35]" However, the citation ([35] "100 Best Jazz Recordings". Telegraph. Retrieved 2015-08-30) has no mention of the Columbia recordings or anything about comparative quality. This reads like an advertisement. Is there a real source to back this statement? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.25.112.18 (talk) 02:13, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Broughton
The section on Smith’s death refers several times to someone named Broughton, but that person is never identified. Could someone clarify who this is and why they were at the scene? 207.254.175.169 (talk) 02:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:44, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Bessie Smith - Downhearted Blues (1923).ogg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:52, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Bessie Smith - Downhearted Blues (1923).ogg

hioiroieffff efebfebfebewpefiefefpe efebfkefebfifrfbgubgr rgbrougbjrbgerogbrfoe;urf'uefw rfhrobforebf;ubgbreg rfbrefbrufbfuofrjfbeoukfbrjefberf refbrefbjrebfhrefuoerfjrbghtgrf gnrfgrefnrgbreogvrjegurbgufgruobg rhgbrfbrguogbrigbrjbgrhbgrbg gbrg rgjrgurjgkbrugorbgkhrgubrg rgbrgbrgrg r grgjrjgbrjgbrjefbrjgbr gr girgjrigrnghrugbjr grfrgrokjgjbjdfijsbifbdieifijwofuduvieicb i. fieifebejif diiqwde i iefkwip ef evbkfjcwifkw f ewfbwfjwfcjkwbjv neviokvj wfiwvnouebrrfeufbhefvuoeofbf w qjodwbuofhewf efwuodvhwbuobhy8r4754638rw dfveuofbehjfe fhvf eidf 99.185.226.241 (talk) 22:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)


 * stop is this fr? 99.185.226.241 (talk) 22:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC)