Talk:Beti languages

Neither macrolanguage nor cluster?
Open question: Why, if Beti is not considered a language, but the group of Ewondo, Fang, Bulu, Eton, Bebele, Bebil, Mengisa are "largely mutually intelligible and variously considered dialects [of what?] or closely related languages," it was not reframed as either a macrolanguage or a cluster? Must be more to the linguistic relationship than is discussed in this article.--A12n (talk) 23:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Beti language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110911151604/http://www.sil.org:80/iso639-3/documentation.asp?id=btb to http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/documentation.asp?id=btb
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121016214510/http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/chg_detail.asp?id=2009-032 to http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/chg_detail.asp?id=2009-032

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:11, 1 November 2016 (UTC)