Talk:Between Silk and Cyanide

Fair use rationale for Image:Cover-book-BetweenSilkAndCyanide.jpg
Image:Cover-book-BetweenSilkAndCyanide.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 13:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

This reads like a review
This reads like a review. I imagine there's a template for the occasion, but I'm not aware of it. Tophtucker (talk) 06:40, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I've subdued a lot of the connotation ands essay tools e.g. emotive wording which peppered this article now.- Adam37 Talk  20:21, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

copyvio
It reads like a review (per above) because a bunch of text from an Amazon review was pasted in 2006 and the rest of the article text was written around that. I just reverted to the stub-like version from before the review was pasted, in order to get rid of the copyvio. It should be possible to rebuild the article by carefully separating any Amazon-derived text from the last version in the article history. Alternatively the article could just be rewritten from scratch. 67.119.3.248 (talk) 03:27, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

war story
Is the subtitle A Codemaker's Story as in the article title or A Codemaker's War as in the body? —Tamfang (talk) 23:41, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Humour reception
The book provides an excellent example of dry wit, which might be described as 'British humour'. I'm curious to know how this humour went down with readers of other nationalities. Anyone know, or wish to write a paragraph or two about it? FreeFlow99 (talk) 10:16, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I would have said gallows humour would be the more international term. British humour fluxes and is diverse. This is, alas, not the place for OPINIONSs on humour, in general, above all for a book which does not purport to be a humour book. This having been said if enough critics savour it for certain humour styles or anecdotes then I am sure a cited mention or two of review coupled with line would not be objected to by wikipedia's policy on This is not an Editorial and similar allied policies.- Adam37 Talk  20:26, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

an alike role

 * agents working with or in an alike role as the Dutch resistance

This looks like a translation. Does it mean "in or with the D.r."? —Tamfang (talk) 19:59, 9 July 2023 (UTC)