Talk:Beverly Archer

Death?
I've fully protected this page for two days. We cannot definitively claim that the subject is deceased based on the evidence currently available to us. Right now, all we have is a blog that says she is. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:19, 12 October 2012 (UTC)


 * This site also lists it: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/alt.obituaries/miWK_rRS508 Quis separabit?  20:09, 12 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Usenet? Seriously? --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:15, 12 October 2012 (UTC)


 * I apologize if the source was unacceptable. Sometimes it's hard to tell which are reliable or not. I am so happy it is not true. 64 is far too young to die for no apparent reason. Quis separabit?  19:28, 13 October 2012 (UTC)


 * We can pretty much put this to bed - this appears to be nothing more than a hoax. One of the refs looks to be user-generated content that wasn't close to being a reliable source - the link has since been removed or hidden. The second apparently used the first ref as its source, soon realized its mistake, and also removed it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:28, 12 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Hoax, here's the scoop: http://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards/showthread.php?t=304884 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.149.198.212 (talk) 16:23, 13 October 2012 (UTC)