Talk:Biblical archaeology school

What this article lacks, imho
This is not a bad article, in that it adequately explains the Albrightian model and its rejection by modern scholars. But the aftermath is not written up well (I mean the 'Biblical archaeology today' section). There is no clear explanation of the new theories on the subject, instead there is an arcane (and not very germane here, I think) discussion of archeological methods. Besides, the whole section seems to give undue emphasis to the work of Devers (probably because it was written by an editor who read Devers' book).

Alas, I am not a professional at this or even a knowledgeable dilettante - my knowledge (at this stage, at least) is only sufficient to point out the gaps, not to fill them. So hope someone picks up the golve who is qualified to do so. Bazuz (talk) 07:57, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Biblical archaeology school. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080413144131/http://bc.ub.leidenuniv.nl/bc/olg/portret/content.html to http://bc.ub.leidenuniv.nl/bc/olg/portret/content.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761554970/Biblical_Archaeology.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:38, 19 July 2017 (UTC)