Talk:BigBang (South Korean band)/GA2

GA Reassessment[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Looking at this article again and have major concerns after seeing it be tagged by 100cellsman. The article meets the immediate failure criteria due to the tag still being valid.

The article has pretty consistent neutrality problems. It's incredibly one-sided — the lead states that "the media" (no reference to a specific publication) labels them as the "Kings of K-Pop" and cites six very different articles discussing different things. In the Legacy section, the article says they "revolutionized the music industry" and does not quote it from the source provided. There is an entire section that has the title "Critical acclaim", containing no criticism of their albums at all, and labels them "fashion icons" without a source. The entire article only lists one criticism at the end of the Legacy section about cultural appropriation. In terms of Verifiability, the article has numerous sources from sites that appear on WP:KO/RS that I cannot verify when looking for a reliable publication publishing the same information. DanielleTH ^{(Say hi!)} 16:56, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strong yes - This article is incredibly old and has barely been touched since enlistment took place. I think reassessment would be perfect for the article.-K-popguardian (talk) 00:59, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Going to delist this. Support by the major editors tagged and issues have not been addressed. Should the neutrality be improved this can be a GA again. DanielleTH ^{(Say hi!)} 05:31, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]