Talk:Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area

Merge proposal
Proposal to merge Big South Fork of the Cumberland River into Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area: no reason given? Doesn't make sense to me as the river is not the recreation area and vice versa, even if closely related. Wouldn't it look odd to have a recreation area page in a list of Kentucky rivers, for example? Which infobox would be used, the river one or the protected area one? Pfly (talk) 17:51, 11 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I agree: the two articles should remain separate. One is about the river, and the other is a about a National Park Service site. I suppose the name Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area makes it sound like the NPS area includes just the river, but that's not the case. --Orlady (talk) 18:00, 11 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm against the merger, mainly for reasons already stated (one is a geological entity and one is a political entity). Standard practice seems to be to separate the two, for example Mount Hood and Mount Hood National Forest, Guadalupe Mountains and Guadalupe Mountains National Park, Everglades and Everglades National Park.  Bms4880 (talk) 17:58, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140517082727/http://charitcreeklodge.com/ to http://www.charitcreeklodge.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:21, 23 November 2017 (UTC)