Talk:Blonde d'Aquitaine

"... and was an excellent tool for natural selection and genetic superiority." This comment is rather irritating. It does not became clear what the author whats to expresswith this.

I agree and have removed it. --Charles (talk) 22:37, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Reclassified as stub
The WikiProject classification for Blonde d'Aquitaine was. It has been reclassified as  per request. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 16:09, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Blonde d'Aquitaine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080316051025/http://www.ansi.okstate.edu:80/breeds/cattle/blondedaquitaine/index.htm to http://www.ansi.okstate.edu/breeds/cattle/blondedaquitaine/index.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070606103301/http://www.blondecattle.org:80/ to http://www.blondecattle.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:48, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20060829022049/http://www.blondes.asn.au/breedfeatures.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:05, 12 November 2016 (UTC)