Talk:Bloomberg Businessweek/Archives/2012

Editorial slant of BW
One item that many readers of Wikipedia seek is an honest assessment of the particular econo/political slant of a publication or publisher. There is no hint here of Business Week's 'view' of the world. The Wall Street Journal, for instance, is known for taking an aggressive pro-free-market editorial position, particularly with the recent purchase of the magazine by Rupert Murdoch's NewsCorp.

If anyone knows the position of Business Week, it wouldn't hurt to put a short summary in the opening paragraph. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.204.201.62 (talk) 14:37, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Robertson v. McGraw-Hill Co., Weiss, and Shepard
FYI. Ikip 18:00, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Rename article?
The magazine's name is Bloomberg BusinessWeek as of December 2009. I've made appropriate edits to the first sentence and to a few other places, but have not yet moved the article as I'm quite sure most people still call it BusinessWeek. YLee (talk) 06:10, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

iPad version section
I've copied the article to my sandbox and made some updates to the iPad version section to indicate newer published facts and also the 2012 Webby award. Due to WP:COI if someone could review User:Andrewmp/sandbox/Bloomberg_Businessweek Mobile version section and merge if appropriate, I'd appreciate it. - Andrewmp (talk) 14:06, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I added it, but I removed the pricing. I feel it is unnecessary and makes the thing seem promotional.  Ryan Vesey  Review me!  15:54, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Competitors and slant
In tone and content, it is not that different from The Economist: moderate, pragmatic. Especially compared to Forbes and the WSJ. But not as international. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.175.71.111 (talk) 03:12, 23 June 2012 (UTC)