Talk:Bloomberg Television/Archives/2012

Links to "list of channels available on..." articles
Bloomberg is an international channel NOT a channel unique to the US. A list of all channels on two platforms that take a feed of the channel in the US are therefore irrelevant to the article.

AS AFAICT Wikipedia is an international effort as opposed to a US one, the logical conclusion of the include it argument is to have a list of "list of channels available on..." which will include cable, satellite, DTT, ands IPTV platforms all over the world. Logically each channel should also have a link to each of these lists of other channels on platforms that it is available in.

Perhaps a more satisfactory approach might to be a category "Channels on..."? Pit-yacker 00:17, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Is it worth mentioning Bloomberg may have competetion mainly from CNBC. (But I don't know anything about it, so I may be wrong) Cs92 14 November 2006

Channel Listings on an Encyclopedia?
Channels are rearranged on various cable and sattelite systems around world constantly. Why even list them here? This is not TV Guide, it's an encyclopedia. Piperdown 02:32, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

80% of text is about a "Controversy"
Articles should not exist solely for the purpose of axe grinding. Piperdown 02:32, 15 March 2007 (UTC)