Talk:Blumhouse Productions

Should Blumhouse Productions become public in 2017/2018?
I hope so :-) 2A02:C7D:75D7:9300:2D7E:AA82:F779:77C1 (talk) 15:50, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

BH Tilt needs a list of films.
Can we add a list of BH Tilt films to this page instead of putting them in the Blumhouse Productions list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:980:4001:BF80:DCC0:5A66:BCF:5999 (talk) 00:37, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

We can do a list like this: 98.235.48.206 (talk) 01:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC) By the way, add the budget and gross of each released film. 98.235.48.206 (talk) 03:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC) Oh, no chart for BH Tilt films, huh? FINE! I won't put the chart back on Blumhouse Productions because I know BH Tilt already has an overview for it's films. IN FACT, forget the chart that had BH Tilt's films on it! Eh, screw this comment. 98.235.48.206 (talk) 21:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Never mind. I added the budgets and grosses of the released films already. 98.235.48.206 (talk) 18:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Pronunciation
I was curious, so I did a Google search. I found this tweet, which says it's pronounced like "plum". Maybe this should be added to the article? Not sure, and I can't figure out these IPA templates. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:30, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Sleight is not a drama film!
Seriously, what idiot keeps on changing it back to Drama? Go watch the damn trailer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.58.91.250 (talk) 08:38, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

SOMEBODY HELP ME!!!
HELP! I'm having problems fixing the 2016 part of the Blumhouse Productions list. Something's wrong with it! 98.235.48.206 (talk) 02:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Never mind. I fixed it. 98.235.48.206 (talk) 02:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

I'm afraid Blumhouse does not do Birth of the Dragon, only BH Tilt does.
Reminder:

Birth of the Dragon is NOT by Blumhouse Productions. It's just by BH Tilt. 98.235.48.206 (talk) 02:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Tell that to The Green Inferno. --LegerPrime (talk) 18:35, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

FIlmography
I'm thinking we should convert that into a table rather than a series of paragraphs.--Aresef (talk) 12:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Why? Chiagozie Elobuike (talk) 15:03, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I think so too! In my opinion, it would improve the readability of the article--I'm not sure if other people have had this issue, but I find myself struggling to focus on that specific part of the article due to how many links are squished together on the same few lines. | Angelicblade (talk) 18:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

A Haunted Movies Section?
While replying to the thread above, I started to wonder why Haunted Movies is listed under the Film section. I can sort of understand why it doesn't have its own section, since it's not a subsidiary like BH Tilt, but the way that it causes the Film section to go from a brief history of the company as a whole to just focusing on Haunted Movies' releases makes me feel that it would be better off in its own section. Plus, I believe keeping the Haunted Movies part of the section the way it is now has a chance of causing some confusion, since someone who doesn't check out the List of Blumhouse Productions projects article may get the idea that these are the only movies that the studio has produced. | Angelicblade (talk) 18:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)