Talk:Board of Deputies of British Jews

References?
This is a good article, but it really needs to be more heavily sourced.Jamal (talk) 23:22, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

The article says "while Lord Rothschild was President of the Board of Deputies, the Balfour Declaration was addressed to him..." However, the article says that Rothschild was President of the Board of Deputies in 1925-1926, while the Balfour Declaration is dated 1917. How can this be?

old talk
Yours truly,--Ludvikus 16:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Sources of Interpal Suit vs. Board

 * Sharon Sadeh, Palestinian charity sues British Jewry over terror slur reprinted from Haaretz, March 25, 2004.
 * I'm embarassed I didn't even notice it was a David Irving page since his name is all over it. On the other hand it is an interesting test of conclusions reached in these four Reliable Source Board discussions on Reprints of Reliable Source articles, documents by less or non-reliable sources: #1,  #2,  #3,  #4
 * And of course one can always just take off the link!


 * As for the Interpal press release: "InterPal wins Libel Case Against Board of Deputies of British Jews," Interpal, News release 22 December 2005, accessed 9 February 2007.
 * Meanwhile this is what has been said about Organizations Quotes about self, press releases: #1,  #2

Anyway there do seem to be other sources, especially on the press release. When I get a chance. CarolMooreDC (talk) 08:38, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Board of Deputies of British Jews. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131023155653/http://www.bod.org.uk/live/content.php?Category_ID=14 to http://www.bod.org.uk/live/content.php?Category_ID=14

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:10, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Unreliable sources
Can editors please provide justification for the assertion that sources 13 and 14 are unreliable. This assertion seems equally partisan and arbitrary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.179.208.92 (talk) 22:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Greville Janner's alleged misbehaviour
On the article about the Catholic Church, for example, we mention the activities of misbehaving priests, not only in the body of the article, but in the introduction. Shouldn't the same be applied here, in regards to Mr. Greville Janner, who actually led this organisation? Claíomh Solais (talk) 14:22, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Recent edits
I reverted this + added a secondary source at some distance from events. continuing coverage of this does not mention Livingstone's relationship with the Evening Standard (or Daily Mail), and this is irrelevant to the Board's protest over this language. Icewhiz (talk) 07:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Give list of past presidents its own article?
This is quite a long list and rather dominates the article; I do not see such a list in articles on other organizations. Perhaps it should be made into a new separate article. Jontel (talk) 06:54, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

No. A full list of past presidents in this article is entirely appropriate. Not sure what the relevance of other organisations is. Nor does Jontel give a statistical basis for the assertion. Many articles contain long lists of, e.g. notable alumni. Dori1951 (talk) 11:40, 1 February 2022 (UTC)