Talk:Bobby Singer/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Matthew R Dunn (talk) 12:44, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

At first glance, the article is in decent shape.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   In the plot section: "After John's death in the second-season premiere, Bobby allows the brothers to stay at his home to rest up and rebuild the recently-crippled Impala" Do you mean the car Chevrolet Impala? If so, then please link.

   I added a link to the main article's subsection on the Impala. Ωphois 15:59, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

   B. MoS compliance:

   The lead section seems a little short; most of it is about the character, a little on how Jim Beaver was brought into the series. I'd prefer at least another sentence or so (or a second paragraph) detailing more from the development and reception sections (like the part where Beaver thought his character was originally one off, for example).
   In the "characterisation" section, the quote at the end of the first paragraph has no end speech mark (").

   I expanded the lead and fixed the quote. Ωphois 18:09, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Well done with the article so far, I certainly enjoyed reading it. There is just the odd point or two to deal with, and then I will pass this article. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 13:50, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

   Alrighty then, now that all concerns have been resolved, I will now pass this article. Good job! -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 19:31, 13 August 2010 (UTC)