Talk:Boi-ngo

Fair use rationale for Image:BOI-NGO album.jpg[edit]

Image:BOI-NGO album.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Boi-ngo/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Article requirements:

Y Start: reasonably complete infobox; lead section with overview of album; track listing; reference to at least primary personnel by name; Categorization by at least artist and year.
N C: all of start and (1) cover art in infobox; (2) at least one additional section of prose; (3) track lengths & song authors in tracklist; (4) a personnel section including all musicians.
N B: all of C and (1) most technical details in infobox; (2) technical personnel in personnel section; (3) no obvious issues with sourcing; (4) no obvious issues with readability, though it may not conform completely to style guidelines; (5) no glaring omissions of information (see some suggestions at WP:ALBUM) or extraneous information, like trivia.

Higher Classes are not assigned by WikiProject Album. Please review "the perfect article" and, if already B class, consider seeking additional feedback from Wikipedia:Good articles or Wikipedia:Featured articles.

Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Assessment for additional information on article class. To request a reassessment from the Album project, when concerns are addressed, please see "requesting an assessment". --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:34, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 17:34, 13 October 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 09:59, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Production sound[edit]

Agreed there is still strong use of sequencers and synthesisers. My "stripped down" description referred to the sparser mixing of this album compared to their previous, this one uses much less overdubs for the most part with more punchy rhythm, but I suppose this is down to interpetation so can be removed. Although I did think the previous "prominent use of synthesisers" was false interpretation because synths and sequencers I'm sure were most prominent on Dead Man's party and SoLo. Would love to hear more from the band about the sound of the albums, every one is a little different and surprising, but they rarely talk about it! Woombamillio (talk) 12:14, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]