Talk:Bonsai aesthetics

Japan: Culture Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 12:50, May 25, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Culture task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Bonsai#Wiring|wiring]] The anchor (#Wiring) has been deleted by other users before.
[[Bonsai#Common styles|literati, or ''Bunjin-gi'']] The anchor (#Common styles) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Separate 'penjing' aesthetics article suggested[edit]

I would like to suggest removing the aesthetics of penjing, which already have a separate article presenting the topic in good detail. Although the two art forms use similar materials (trees, pots), their aesthetic goals and approaches are quite different. Placing them in the same article and essentially duplicating a little of the aesthetics section of the current penjing article does neither subject a favor here. Sahara110 (talk) 20:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Details of penjing aesthetics have been removed and a pointer to its parent article put in place. I have also changed the organization of the items a little. Sahara110 (talk) 22:10, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Working towards "B" class[edit]

I would like to update the article to help it move from "C" class to "B" class by the standards of the Wikiproject Japan working group. Their recent review indicates that project quality criteria are not met for Referencing and citation and Coverage and accuracy. Do any bonsai-interested readers have ideas that might be incorporated to improve the current article? I know I can add some depth in referencing and citation, but improving coverage and accuracy seems a little harder to figure out. Sahara110 (talk) 20:26, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bonsai aesthetics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:01, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]